Brother Charles De Foucauld

North American Jesus Caritas Communities

Archive for the ‘Montreal’ Category

February 19th, 2014 by admin

Montreal 2014 Assembly

Montreal 2014 Assembly

October 9th, 2012 by admin

International Assembly

Fraternity life in Canada: The case for Quebec

Designated delegate: Ciro Piccirillo

1. National report

1.1 The situation in Canada


            Canada is a bilingual (English/French), federal state governed by a parliamentary democracy. As of 2011, it has a population of approximately 35 million. Canada’s economy is one of the world’s largest and is dependent upon its natural resources (fishing, lumber, mining), technology and trade, particularly with the United States. Per capita income is the world’s 9th highest, however the cleavage between rich and poor is accentuating. Historically, Canada has been considered as a nation fostering fundamental, socio-democratic values: peace, egalitarianism, social justice and welfare, environmental protection/conservation and universal healthcare. However, in recent years, Canada, as is the case in Quebec, is undergoing a great social transformation as the current Conservative (right of center), majority government is promoting economic growth and performance at the detriment of pro-environmental, pro-cultural, and pro-social values. Current political positions also do not favor social integration of immigrants, rehabilitation of criminals, research and education. Consequently, Canadian society suffers from a left-right cleavage that frequently separates the rich and poor, the inhabitants and immigrants, the industrialists and the environmentalists, and the pro-wealth and pro-social justice supporters.


1.2 Current status of our Fraternity life in Quebec


            To our knowledge, all Fraternities are currently in the province of Quebec, namely in the cities of Montreal, Longueuil and Sherbrooke. There are no visible traces of Fraternity life in other communities in the rest of Canada, although these may be living the hidden life in the literal sense.

            Montreal was the entry-point of the first Charles de Foucauld Fraternities (lay and priest) in North America in the 1950’s through the work of Father Jacques Leclerc. The lay Fraternities experienced a great excitement in the 1950-60’s before undergoing a significant reduction of its activities around the time of Vatican II. The lay Fraternity underwent a revival in the early 1990’s with a Fraternity in Montreal for young adults and subsequent Fraternities being established in 2003-2012.

            The Fraternities in Montreal (1 Frat of 8), Longueuil (1 Frat of 3) and Sherbrooke (1 Frat of 8) generally meet on a bi-monthly/monthly basis and have revision of life and prayer (Gospel sharing) as the essential cornerstones of their activities. Meal sharing and fraternal encounters within and beyond regular Fraternity meetings are quite frequent.

            In 2003, a Quebec-based association of Friends of Brother Charles (l’Association des Amis de Charles de Foucauld) was established with the goal of reuniting and fostering activities for all individuals who are compelled by the life and message of Brother Charles (lay members, Frat members, priests, Little Sisters, representative from the Muslim communities and “occasional visitors” from Quebec and beyond). The association is led by an elected, coordinating team of 4 who meet regularly to share on the experience of Nazareth and plan regular activities for the year: 1) annual retreat, 2) commemoration of Brother Charles [December 1st], 3) trekking activities, and 4) the annual general assembly for all “members” during which various aspects of Fraternity life are shared, debated and commonly approved.

            The Quebec Fraternity also publishes the periodical Échanges (3-4 times annually: readership of circa 450) whose mission is to articulate the message of Brother Charles through defined topics emerging from various situations of our society, share witnesses and promote thought and reflection on the spirituality of Nazareth.


1.3 Since Arusha (2006) what have we lived? What were our joys, difficulties, and achievements? What are the issues of concern to us?

            Canada did not have representation in Arusha, although it had close ties with the Regional Responsible of the time. Since 2006, our local and national Fraternities have undergone significant growth, albeit not without growing pains. While our Fraternities have increased in numbers and new members have since joined, a number of our elderly members (eg Father Jacques Leclerc) with a lifelong experience of Nazareth have passed away or left our Fraternity, leaving behind their “soul-full” presence and humble invitation to pursue our walk towards Nazareth in a spirit of littleness and service for Him.

            Our primary “achievement” and source of joy is our continued presence to the needy, the ill, the immigrant and the impoverished in the midst of our local communities: schools, day-care, hospitals, or neighborhoods. Another source of joy comes from the renewed commitment individuals make daily to continue pursuing the love of Christ and sharing the experience of Brother Charles despite the numerous incongruities and hardships of their lives. Some additional achievements include, annual retreats and Nazareth desert weekends for the Fraternity, a centralized library of books, periodicals, video and literary resources (>400 French or English items) on Brother Charles, and more recently, the creation of the official website for the Fraternity ( Lastly, we are particularly proud of the friendly and loving relationships we have maintained with numerous Fraternities in the United States (Boston, NYC, Mount Vernon, Philadelphia, Buffalo, Cleveland), Europe (eg; France and England) and Africa (eg; Burkina Faso). These relationships have served as a deep source of strength and hope in our inner response to live the hidden life and humbly serve others for Christ.

            Despite the joyful growth of our global Fraternity in Quebec, we are nonetheless facing our share of fragility and littleness, a humble reminder that we are called to seek Christ in the simple encounters of our respective Nazareths. Some of our primary concerns include: 1) How do we foster Fraternity life outside of Quebec (rest of Canada)?; 2) How do we propose Fraternity to the younger generations?; 3) How can we highlight the relevance of the life of Brother Charles to others and propose it as a modern way/guide of life?; 4) How can Fraternity serve or complement the local Church in its ongoing mission of evangelization; and 5) While revision of life is the core of the Fraternity, it remains a delicate and fragile reality. How do we emphasize its importance as the obligatory corridor through which we discern the presence of Christ in the fragile, humble and poor events/encounters of our lives? How do we accentuate the importance of “desert day” in the preparation of a review of life?


2. Report on reflections on theme: Daring to meet the other.


2.1 What work did you do regarding the topic?


            In the past year, we have tried to engage as many individuals as possible in Quebec for their thoughts and personal experiences with the proposed theme of “Daring to meet the other“. Our goal was to generate a certain momentum around the International Assembly, and try to synthesize the collective experience and aspirations in Quebec. To this end, several initiatives were created to foster thought, prayer and sharing on this theme: 1) the association of Friends of Brother Charles (Les Amis de Charles de Foucauld) met for a half-day retreat in October 2011 to reflect and share on this theme as seen through the passage of Zacchaeus and the sycomore tree (Luke 19: 1-10); 2) The theme was also proposed at the annual assembly (April 2012) of the les Amis so that it may reflect and share on the theme in a special way; 3) the Montreal lay Fraternity reflected on this theme during its weekend long retreat (April 2012); and finally, 4) the delegate for Canada personally engaged many individuals who live, or are attracted, by the charism of Brother Charles in unique ways (Montreal, Longueuil, Sherbrooke Fraternities, Little Sisters, Jesus-Caritas priests, friends, etc.) to share with me their personal thoughts on the theme. All contributions (written, verbal or other) from all persons were welcomed regardless of their form.

2.2 Summarize what you discovered about the topic:


            In all encounters during our year-long preparation, the delegate for Canada made use of a beautiful poem entitled “Daring to meet the other” from the African continental Fraternity (adapted from le Courier d’Afrique) which served as the cornerstone for the individual reflections and collective sharing. In our view, this simple poem embodies the very essence of the IA theme, and exudes the spirit of Brother Charles in our lives. We felt it necessary to present an adapted form here:




When you meet someone, do not begin to draw on them on YOUR side;

first, you must play show openness and adaptability.

You must meet one on their land.

Seek what makes the person live, what they like to talk about,

what are their concerns, hopes and dreams.

Go from this to make contact.

Reciprocity will come after and they will slowly greet you on YOUR side …

When you meet someone, do not stop at first impressions as these are far too often not always our true self.

Someone once said, “Let your first contact with another be a gentle touch on the canvas where you gradually sketch out their portrait. “

We need more than one day to truly know someone.

It is only during the long, common journey that we discover each other in our true light….that we truly learn to embrace each other.

We must humbly remind ourselves that we will never finish to discover the other.

The world today speaks much about sharing.

Have we thought about what this word really means?

You will say: “Sharing means giving.”

This is true: it is to give the best of yourself.

But sharing also means to receive:

Believe that the other has something to bring me.

It’s not necessarily something material but likely something I’m missing: a smile, a lending ear, wonder listening, solidarity, respect for others …”

            This year of preparation for the International Assembly was an incredibly enriching experience for us all. This experience enabled us to meditate much on the traces of Jesus of Nazareth at the heart of our personal journeys. We can only be deeply moved when one witnesses individuals whose lives cry the Gospel, and when the life of Christ nurtures the lives of others. To be present to others…. to be a reflection of God’s love to others…. to take the small road, in a spirit of service, to personally meet Christ in others.

            What does “Daring to meet the other” mean? Where is the risk (ie. dare means to challenge, confront, or defy) in engaging another? Risk is bilateral as both sides must accept to let go of our preconceived image of ourselves and of others…. letting the other see our real side…. accepting not to dominate or triumph over the other…. accepting the fragile hope of something better to come…. accepting that the other has something vital for my growth and personal encounter with Jesus. Indeed, Life emerges in us when we accept to dare an encounter with another. Each time, we take the risk of accepting that the difference, which potentially divides individuals, can serve as a source of common life. The real risk is to believe that this difference, far from being a divisive point, is a necessary transition to the unconditional acceptance of each other for the love of Christ.

            Numerous examples in the Gospel illustrate that the spirit of littleness and poverty is needed to bear witness and meet Christ in others, and to seek Nazareth at the heart of our encounters. This Jesus who met the Samaritan woman, Zaccheus, Levi, Lazarus, the prostitute or the centurion, is the same who greets us through our encounters, with the same look, the same intensity and the same love. By choosing to live by Jesus’ example, through the footsteps of Brother Charles, we reveal a path of renewal in our dialogue with others. Encountering the Other is a key passage towards God and should be considered as a source of growth, without which we could not live. In the name of Jesus, we delve into the heart of our relationships to better experience the universal brotherhood in our hidden lives. In Fraternity, we understand that to follow Jesus and live the Gospel more deeply, we must be in unity with our human experiences and those of others.

2.3 An “acute” problem lived in our social context:

            Since February 2012, Quebec is crossing a period of great social transformation. While some view this period of history as social unrest and turbulence, others view it as a necessary revolution for the common good. How did this begin? Our current government is rather unpopular for several political decisions over the past nine years, but is particularly affected by numerous, serious scandals regarding illegitimate expenditures and mismanagement of public funds. Thus, the people view the Liberal party presently in power as lacking the moral ground to govern.

            What is the “acute” problem in question? Currently, there is a volatile situation in Quebec (Montreal in particular) regarding a government-imposed hike in college and university tuition fees. As much as one third of all students are striking against this tuition fee hike. Those in favor of the tuition fee hike (recognized by their green square cloth piece pinned to their chest) argue that the state cannot sustain its operations without this increased revenue from students who are paying the lowest tuition fees in the country and whose tuition fees have not increased in a period of 15-20 years. Conversely, those opposed to this hike (recognized by their red square cloth piece pinned to their chest) argue that it limits the access of the socially under-privileged to higher education and heightens their debt load. While fees were the trigger of this social unrest more than 20 weeks ago, it has now spread to other government-sponsored policies/programs and social aspects of our society. It is truly creating a division amongst the people and has generated a certain amount of “violence” publicly. On the one hand, some view this violence as a necessary means to justified ends, and any attempt by police to control this violence is viewed as a form of police repression. On the other hand, others view it as an illegal action that must be punished by law. This entire situation has been fueled by the flagrant inability of the government (possibly for short-term political gains) to engage a dialogue with student representatives in order to reach a timely and peaceful resolution. This ongoing divisiveness among the population has been likened to that found 17 years ago during the provincial referendum for sovereignty. While for the past several generations in Quebec, most polarizing issues dealt mainly with the language issue (French vs. English), now it seems the issue has been divided into what is considered Left and Right in economical and social values.

            Where does all this leave us? This situation has led to a Quebec-wide passionate debate in which members of all social classes (including Fraternity members!) fiercely defend their camped positions, often without any attempt at truly understanding opposing views. In the absence of true reciprocity between pro-government and pro-student supporters, true dialogue and resolution are not possible.

            The dominant questions in Fraternity: what meaning comes out of this sterile debate? Can one accept an opposing view without embracing the human experience underlying these views? Is there a cry from God that emanates from this social unrest to which we should be sensitive to? More importantly, how can we re-establish a hopeful dialogue and propose a path of reconciliation?


Read the rest of this entry »